Binning Bad News: Health Minister Edwina Hart 'withheld NHS report'
Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Kirsty Williams produced the document in the Senedd
Health Minister Edwina Hart has been accused of withholding a consultants' report which criticises the Welsh Assembly government's NHS leadership.
Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Kirsty Williams made the accusation in the Senedd, producing a McKinsey document.
Mrs Hart had previously said there was "no formal document for scrutiny".
The assembly government said Mrs Hart misled no-one, there was no McKinsey report, and the document was an example of "numerous inputs and analysis".
The consultants' conclusions were made public by Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Kirsty Williams during First Minister's Questions.
She asked First Minister Carwyn Jones how he explained "the existence of this report, which I have here, commissioned by his health minister, written by McKinsey and company".
She said the report described the assembly government's strategic objectives as 'too numerous and are not prioritised so that none or the wrong objectives are implemented'."
Ms Williams said the health minister had previously stated there was no McKinsey report and accused her of having "misled" AMs and the people of Wales by not publishing the "damning" report.
Mr Jones asked Ms Williams to write to him if she had any complaint about earlier statements given by the health minister. 'Five-year plan'
In a later statement, a spokesman for the Welsh Assembly Government said: "The (health) minister has not misled anyone. There is no McKinsey report. "
Edwina Hart did not mislead anyone, says the assembly government
The spokesman said the document produced by Ms Williams was "one such example" of "numerous inputs and analysis" which formed part of a five-year plan for the NHS.
He added: "The minister has been transparent throughout the whole process."
The McKinsey document made public by the Welsh Liberal Democrats identified criticisms of the way strategies have been implemented in the Welsh health service.
It said: "Our discussions have highlighted several reasons why strategy implementations have fallen short in Wales."
It noted:
- strategic objectives are too numerous and not prioritised, so none or the wrong ones are implemented
- a gap between policy leads and operational delivery
- strategic objectives are politically unviable
- implementation lacks accountability
- initiatives are financially unaffordable
- lack of capability to deliver
The document also made a number of recommendations to make savings. These included:
- prevent interventions of limited clinical value
- transfer cost of non-essential items items to patients (e.g nicotine patches)
- shut elective care over Christmas period
- require non-clinical nursing staff to cover shifts
- reduce staffing levels e.g overtime
- freeze pay spend (in certain areas).
The row that's erupted over the McKinsey analysis of the Welsh health service is basically a battle of semantics.
For the Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Kirsty Williams, it was an open and shut case. The health minister had denied the existence of a report by the management consultants in two written answers to AMs earlier this year.
Her industrious staff then unearthed a 60-page document written by McKinsey, which she flourished theatrically in front of First Minister Carwyn Jones.
The assembly government's defence is clear and specific. It is not a report, merely a document which was part of a much wider five year framework for the NHS as a whole.
In a sense, you pays your money and you takes your choice.
But document or report, Mr Jones looked uncomfortable, and it's an early political hit for the Lib Dem leader on the first day of the new term.
2 comments:
Miss Wagstaff is BACK! Hip, Hip Hurray.
If the Lid Dem have any sense, they should pursue this with gusto and at every opportunity. It is clear to anyone with an ounce of intelligence that not only has Edwina Hart misled the Assembly, but she has then tried to cover it up.
Various FOIs would discover who had briefed the McKinsey consultants on the project, who had signed the project off, how much their very expensive advice cost etc etc.
The usual crapola emanating from the Assembly spin machine should not detract them from getting the truth on this matter. Labour Ministers may think they can act as if they are members of the old Soviet politburo - they rest of us rightly think differently.
Post a Comment