Thursday, 18 September 2008

A Betsan by any other name would smell as sweet

Another Welsh blogger has taken to reporting about the fate of Christopher Glamorganshire, with more success than I when it comes to the latest gossip.

Betsan Powys' latest post covers what she's heard in "Free speech, huge bills?":

"If you were born in Cardiff, why didn't your parents call you Betsan South Glamorgan?"

A question endured in school over and again but now, of course, I know the answer. As Christopher Glamorgan has proven, it would have been too dangerous a name to adopt.

Who is Christopher? He is - or was - a civil servant of many years, employed by the Welsh Assembly Government and who was sacked as a result of publishing an anonymous blog.

Whether the case against him stands up or not has been a matter of some discussion in parts of the Welsh blogosphere (particularly here) already.

For what it's worth, this is what I know.

The latest suggestion is that his tribunal case is going ahead, that it's unlikely to be heard until next year but that it will be discussed in an internal meeting, presumably in government offices in Cathays Park, next week.

Why was he sacked?

His thoughts on "Who would be a leader in a wicked, wicked world" drew the attention of someone in Cathays Park in July of last year. A flurry of confidential Emails started:

"This is the blog I mentioned earlier - reading it all and the profile places the individual in the Bay picking up plenty of insider stuff on WAG".

The then Permanent Secretary, Sir Jon Shortridge, gets involved.

"The Permanent Secretary has asked me to check if any emails have gone out to this blog site (or if people apart from ... have browsed). The site has contained some detail which may have links with leak enquiries".

He was sacked and and as things stand is taking his case to tribunal, despite his union, the PCS, heeding advice they've been given that he has some mountain to climb, such a mountain, carrying the threat of such a big bill at the end, that they've decided he must climb it alone.

Solicitors acting for the government don't mince their words. In letters I've had sight of they sum up the conclusions of the Employment Judge (and bear in mind I'm quoting their own summing up here, not quotes from a transcript) like this:

the "claim has little reasonable prospect of success", the blog was "contrary to the civil service code" and "has the potential to cause an embarrassment to the Welsh Assembly Government", therefore breaking the code.

Had 'Christopher Glamorgan' been guilty of "excessive internet abuse and potential copyright infringement" alone the judge seems to conclude that a final written warning would have been enough. However the blog, "the most serious of the issues", means dismissal "would fall within the band of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer".

The letter ends on what I'll call a blunt note: go ahead and we'll apply for a full costs order against you, one that covers all fees, charges, disbursements and expenses incurred by WAG.

Give in now and we won't.

Thanks for the hat-tip Betsan.


Matt Wardman 18 September 2008 at 20:26  

I've looked really, really hard and I *still* can't find anything that makes "having the *potential* to cause embarrassment to the WAG" a sackable offence.

Who'd be a Civil Servant in a wicked, wicked, world.

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 22:21  

He signed a contract of employment and agreed to abide by a civile service code of conduct. He did this voluntarily. He broke this legally binding contract, what does he expect?
Good riddance I say!

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 22:33  

Anonymous 22:21

How do we know that you're not part of the government or work for the solicitor mentioned?

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 22:36  

Tribunals are renowned for not awarding costs against applicants unless the claim is an absolute no hoper. If the claim is still active, then the Tribunal Service must be backing a tribunal.

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 23:19  

jobless figures in wales jump by 3000, lets concentrate on the one who abused his priveledged position in work and new what was coming.
come on pippa,

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 23:21  

Anonymous 23:19

This aside, who said he abused his position?

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 23:24  

"How do we know that you're not part of the government or work for the solicitor mentioned?"

How do I know you are not a paranoid conspiracy theorist?

This is the trouble with this case - utter and complete paranoia!

He broke the terms of a contract he entered into voluntarily. That's all there is to say about it.

Which bit dont you understand?

Anonymous 18 September 2008 at 23:29  

"He broke the terms of a contract he entered into voluntarily. That's all there is to say about it."

Broke what terms? Either you don't understand or you're not telling us everything you know. You can't make your first statement without backing it up.

David Thomas 18 September 2008 at 23:32  

I liked the blog. It wasn't harmful in any way, shape or form. WAG had no policy on blogging and according to the media he didn't reveal any secrets.

Terms of Contract has nothing to do with it.

BBC UK Politics

BBC Welsh Politics


Welsh Political News

UK News from Times Online

Telegraph Politics


Words © The Author [Posted by...] 2007 2008 2009 2010. Comments © their authors.


This is a personal blog - any views expressed are not those of the authors' employer(s), or organisation(s) they are involved with or represent.

Comments posted by readers of this blog do not necessarily reflect the views of the authors.

We don't accept any responsibility for the content of any blogs or websites linked from this site. Links exist to provide a wider experience of politics and life on the internet or to reciprocate for links on this blog.

For further information please refer to our Terms and Conditions.
Copyright © Miss Wagstaff Presents 2007 2008 2009 2010
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.

  © Blogger template 'Perfection' by 2008

Back to TOP