Not Nice
Matching up expensive drug treatments with limited funds is not easy. Today Anna Wolfenden published her open letter to the Assembly Government health minister about a cancer drug that is not yet available on the NHS. She is not the first to complain about the decisions of NICE, the body with the difficult task of deciding which treatments can be funded.
During debates of this sort you can always rely on someone to invoke the ghost of Aneurin Bevan by mentioning the 'principles of the NHS' (namely that treatment is free at the point of need). But health expenditure is going to simply carry on rising all the time - and faster than our ability to pay.
Are these 'principles of the NHS' really fit for twenty-first century healthcare purposes? Surely equitable health outcomes for all might be a better principle to aspire to rather than holding fast to a mechanism for delivery that was not planned with these expensive drugs in mind. Anyway, in England (and for the moment in Scotland) you have to pay for your prescriptions, so treatment is already not free at the point of need across the NHS.
Posts
3 comments:
Most of those that need prescriptions in Wales under the old system got them free.
The problem is we've now got people going to their GPs for things like Asprin and Tampons on prescription. The idea of the free prescriptions in the first place was to secure more votes for the sagging labour party, nothing more, nothing less.
The Lib Dem principle of free prescriptions was for people who had long term conditions, like arthritis who have to take medications over a number of years or for the rest of their life or until a cure comes along.
In addition, we have a precription system now in place in England whereby the medication prescribed is substancially less than the cost of the prescription.
G. Lewis
Bridgend Lib Dems
Dear Miss Wagstaff Presents, Administrator
The topic of health care in the 2008 U.S. presidential election is one that is high on the minds of Americans. However, while most people are well aware of the immense challenges facing our health system (rising costs of medical care, malpractice, high prescription drug costs, medical bankruptcies, employers dropping coverage, 47 million uninsured Americans, etc.), they have less understanding of the specific solutions proposed by Senators Obama and McCain.
We invite you to write a post about the topic of health care in ’08. There are clear policy differences between the Obama and McCain plans, who come from two differing philosophies on health care reform.
“HealthDecision ’08: Obama and McCain on Health Care” is an initiative by HealthCare.com (http://www.healthcare.com) to help potential voters understand each candidate’s position. It is an objective comparison of the two platforms, and provides analysis as to the strengths and weaknesses of each. Most importantly, HealthDecision ’08 provides an interactive voting tool that allows users to “vote” for a preferred plan. HealthDecision can be accessed at http://decision.healthcare.com/obama-mccain/.
HealthDecision ’08 will provide you with much of the primary research with which to form a post. In addition, we provide you with links to third-party election coverage from Health08.org, NPR, The New England Journal of Medicine, NY Times, National Journal, U.S. News, WebMD and many other sites, that may serve as supplemental information sources.
I hope you’ll join us in our effort to raise voter understanding on this very important issue. We hope that you will use our information, and also link your readers to our site in order to have their voices heard.
Lastly, if you’re interested in posting real-time results of the HealthDecision ’08 poll, please reply to this email for instructions on embedded our widget onto your blog.
Thank you.
To your health,
Marjorie Saenz
HealthCare.com
Post a Comment